Asus P9X79 LE

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 LE (all builds)
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration	422 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189 5,121 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 256 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 814 82% 663 Pts	64-Core 971 60% 971 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Lighting 98.2 Reflection 89.8 Parallax 143 80% 110 fps	MRender 88.2 Gravity 105 Splatting 125 89% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 870GB free (System drive) Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 0.8 4.1 5.4 0 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 326 Write 146 Mixed 108 SusWrite 2.4 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 38.9 136% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 20.8 DQ Mixed 244 154% 182 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 99%
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 977GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 0.7 4.2 5.7 2.5 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 327 Write 61.3 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 2.7 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 39.3 138% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 52.2 DQ Mixed 247 160% 193 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 99%
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 978GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0.8 4.2 5.7 2.5 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 327 Write 271 Mixed 277 SusWrite 2.7 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 39.5 136% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 247 157% 186 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 99%
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 978GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 0.8 4.3 4.7 2.5 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 322 Write 38.8 Mixed 167 SusWrite 2.5 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 29 125% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 30.7 59% 125 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 99%
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 324GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0.8 4.2 5.7 2.5 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 308 Write 54.5 Mixed 375 SusWrite 2.7 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 39.6 97% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 32.9 DQ Mixed 78 77% 130 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 99%
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 978GB free Firmware: R070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 0.8 4.2 4.7 2.5 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 317 Write 27.5 Mixed 102 SusWrite 2.6 24% 112 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 7.8 97% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 2.6 DQ Mixed 39.5 54% 107 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 8x8GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 39.7 121% 42.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 56.9 70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 1,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 LE - $99

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	346x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	272x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	202x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	79x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	54x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	43x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	35x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16