HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '16 at 08:35
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3687U 2,933 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 21.1 2-Core 79.6 29% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 200 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 2.43 1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GB 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: M504 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2901 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 46 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1639 (AA) Unknown 99 99 16 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 81 (AE) Unknown 100 100 46 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4015806481135 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1589 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 193274576931 (C2) HDA temperature 65 55 193274576931 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1338875724 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	55.5% Above average	Read 460 Write 329 Mixed 395 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 10.1 50% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 47 DQ Write 48.6 DQ Mixed 22.1 24% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.3 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	339x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	313x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	171x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	952x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16