| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock X99M Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150528 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '20 at 19:07 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel @ 2.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
64.6%
Good
|
54% 87.3 Pts
|
49% 412 Pts
|
84% 1,354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
51% 61.7 fps
|
49% 60.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
89% 401 MB/s
|
136% 44.6 MB/s
|
260% 348 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
202GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 628 634 632 633 635 MB/s
|
178%
Outstanding
|
270% 1,212 MB/s
|
151% 51.4 MB/s
|
344% 469 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
270GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 187 192 190 190 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
103% 142 MB/s
|
157% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
272GB free
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 87 88 87 86 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
69% 94.2 MB/s
|
140% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.9%
Above average
|
61% 21.2 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
47% 85.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 80 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 8x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 9x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $508 |