| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision T5610 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181114 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '20 at 13:35 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
71.3%
Very good
|
66% 111 Pts
|
52% 433 Pts
|
122% 1,965 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.34
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
18% 20.1 fps
|
18% 21.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 238 230 215 219 216 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
70% 311 MB/s
|
83% 24.1 MB/s
|
88% 134 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170GB0-CMA 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.9%
Very good
|
85% 29.7 GB/s
|
23% 8.13 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 687 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 66x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 79x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |