Huananzhi X79-4M

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79-4M (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190317
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 01:33
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 81 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 117 55% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 404 40% 325 Pts	64-Core 474 29% 474 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 304E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 480GB 460GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 407 413 417 419 423 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 458 Write 402 Mixed 358 SusWrite 414 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 16.8 86% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 93.2 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 22.8 70% 143 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 78%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 295GB free Firmware: GKAOA9DA SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 22 25 26 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 57.7 Write 25 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 23.9 25% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB 1,540 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79-4M Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-4M

CPU
Xeon E5-2670Intel $53Bench 67%, 4,803 samples	3x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x

SSD
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	2x
BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TBSeagateBench 97%, 3,599 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
INNO8GB1600S Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 12GBUnknownBench 38%, 2 samples	2x
M393B1K70DH0- 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 164 samples	2x
M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 415 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $112

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16