Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime26.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '20 at 15:16
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 264
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 765
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 185
Parallax 183
144% 182 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 170
Splatting 121
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,951
Write 1,294
Mixed 595
281% 1,280 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 64.3
262% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,061
826% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
18GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 445
Mixed 373
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 56.8
200% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
111GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 415 365 341 317 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 440
Mixed 365
SusWrite 364
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.9
202% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 162 160 158 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 153
Write 146
Mixed 68
SusWrite 159
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 108%
SDXC Card 128GB
111GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 79.2
Write 68.2
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 76.1
88% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 4.7
325% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $736
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback