| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 6.43% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-S UCC (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110303 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 02 '20 at 11:12 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48%
Average
|
42% 66.4 Pts
|
24% 175 Pts
|
11% 177 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
|
31.5%
Below average
|
32% 35.8 fps
|
30% 36.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 26 34 5.6 14 MB/s
|
6.43%
Terrible
|
12% 54.5 MB/s
|
3% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
145GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 106 113 113 113 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
72% 98.7 MB/s
|
185% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
24.2%
Poor
|
24% 8.33 GB/s
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
36% 111 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 18x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 17x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 9x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |