Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 32.2 29% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 57.3 8% 58.2 Pts	64-Core 59.8 4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0928) 1,009MB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.72 1% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4e 31GB 789 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3 Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 151 Write 66.7 Mixed 75.1 21% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 4.53 29% 8.87 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 12.9 DQ Mixed 4.79 8% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 24%
Generic SL32G SD Card 32GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free Firmware: 8.0 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 15.6 Mixed 21.6 15% 20 MB/s	4K Read 6.67 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 1.68 514% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 22%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 465GB free, PID 0735 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 34.9 Mixed 10.1 32% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.19 34% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16