PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 37.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190805 |
Uptime | 3.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 01 '20 at 18:17 |
Run Duration | 279 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$459
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1569 1718 1177 1185 1180 MB/s
|
311%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
2TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 3TB
341GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 119 119 119 119 MB/s
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
WD My Book 1TB
236GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 42 42 43 43 MB/s
|
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 3TB
124GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 68 68 68 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 3TB
337GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 110 110 110 MB/s
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
215GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 101 102 MB/s
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 4TB
61GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 19 21 20 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
412GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
|
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 762x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $459Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 602x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 478x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $442Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 206x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 184x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 164x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $1,107 |