Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 11:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 971
87% 733 Pts
64-Core 1326
82% 1326 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.2% Good
Lighting 82.9
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 69.1
68% 77.1 fps
MRender 88.3
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 74.9
64% 78.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 518
Write 495
Mixed 467
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.3
217% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
61GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 106 108 108 112 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 99.3
Mixed 70
SusWrite 109
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
31GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 100 102 98 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 51.5
Write 71.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 100
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
4GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Read 37
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.7
12% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 9%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
150GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 55.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 53.2
73% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.9
204% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW8GX4M1D3000C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback