Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 06:28
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 117
58% 91 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 383
37% 305 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
EVGA(3842 1460) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20
Parallax 15.3
14% 17.6 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 20.1
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 335 394 304 377 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 444
Mixed 298
SusWrite 357
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 50.2
163% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 250
173% 220 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
596GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 112
Write 57
Mixed 61
SusWrite 114
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 63%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$60
465GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 110
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback