Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '20 at 04:53
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 225 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 703 68% 561 Pts	64-Core 871 54% 871 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 96.5 65% 84.3 fps	MRender 75.5 Gravity 82.1 Splatting 62.6 59% 73.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30 32,167 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 141 141 141 142 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 495 Write 142 Mixed 207 SusWrite 140 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 34.5 131% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 130 104% 147 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 107%
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 243GB free Firmware: LHF004C SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 424 426 430 436 436 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 447 Mixed 388 SusWrite 429 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 34 124% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 222 188% 274 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 128%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 20 19 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 130 Write 24.1 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 19 55% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 3.4 173% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 14,957 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 34.7 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 27.6 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	72x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $91Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16