Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer (all builds)
Memory	33.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150422
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 195 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 572 58% 469 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% MSI(1462 37B1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3943 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 154 Parallax 166 98% 147 fps	MRender 171 Gravity 135 Splatting 97.4 106% 134 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 30 69 47 47 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 139 Write 175 Mixed 149 SusWrite 58.4 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 13 34% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 74.1 70% 112 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 65%
Intel(r) 910 200GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 23GB free Firmware: a424 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 351 350 350 342 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 200 Write 292 Mixed 264 SusWrite 341 62% 274 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 23.6 82% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 141 127% 193 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 84%
Intel(r) 910 200GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 54GB free Firmware: a424 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 355 358 357 342 321 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 193 Write 308 Mixed 230 SusWrite 346 61% 269 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 22.6 79% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 140 130% 201 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 84%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 200GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 383 378 109 79 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 368 Write 346 Mixed 258 SusWrite 231 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 31.8 106% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 256 218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 126%
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258 1,264 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 60GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 386 382 400 397 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 371 Write 345 Mixed 289 SusWrite 331 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 32.2 114% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 241 210% 312 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 115%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB 603 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: SC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 45 45 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 68.1 Write 64.5 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 46.3 46% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 102%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.1 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 2.2 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 3 6% 5.65 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 39 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 20.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	50x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	10x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	5x
HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 2,054 samples	4x
GR2133D464L15/8G 2x8GBGoodramBench 73%, 520 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16