HP PRODESK 400 G3 MICROTOWER PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP PRODESK 400 G3 MICROTOWER PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170328
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 07:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 238
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 657
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 350
HP(103C 2B51) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 13.8
10% 13.8 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 17
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 156 160 158 162 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 422
Mixed 363
SusWrite 180
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 52.9
175% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 51.4
96% 188 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback