Fujitsu ESPRIMO P5925

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P5925  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2584-A1
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 19:59
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 82.5
43% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 81.2
8-Core 82
11% 81.6 Pts
64-Core 82.3
5% 82.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 9.06
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 8.57
6% 7.72 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
27GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 217 216 226 219 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 247
Write 228
Mixed 195
SusWrite 222
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 17.3
72% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 84.3
72% 109 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 29 13 26 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 24.3
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
106GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 14 18 17 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 25
Write 19.8
Mixed 2
SusWrite 17.4
20% 16 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.2
91% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P5925 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P5925

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $89
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback