Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 16:05
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 811
85% 682 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.11021.1000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 81.7
57% 71.6 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 56
Splatting 78.6
55% 65.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 463 461 461 449 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 430
Mixed 422
SusWrite 458
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58.8
197% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
329GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 373 146 174 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 428
Mixed 351
SusWrite 250
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 39.3
150% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 202
193% 303 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
118GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 81.3
Write 78
Mixed 52
SusWrite 81.8
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback