Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X411QA_R422QA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X411QA
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 47.9 2-Core 93.7 41% 66.7 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 154 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 18E1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.16.04 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 5.09 3% 4.43 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.91 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1102 512GB 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20180000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 721 652 692 700 674 688 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 1,005 Write 1,000 Mixed 788 SusWrite 688 196% 870 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 40.1 117% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 243 172% 219 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 192%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.4% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.9 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 8.2 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16