Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '19 at 04:11
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 687 73% 583 Pts	64-Core 784 48% 784 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 95.3 233% 95.3 fps
Poor: 49% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 401 452 463 466 445 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,628 Write 1881 Mixed 1358 SusWrite 458 299% 1,331 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 67.5 223% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,219 DQ Write 630 DQ Mixed 537 502% 795 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 228%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 757GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 456 459 460 458 460 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 458 Mixed 424 SusWrite 455 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 52.3 169% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 340 256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	79.4% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.2 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 26.5 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,019x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	442x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	271x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	761x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16