| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q SE2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100331 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 29 '19 at 06:41 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.1%
Average
|
38% 59.2 Pts
|
18% 135 Pts
|
8% 136 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 430.39
|
9.23%
Terrible
|
8% 10.7 fps
|
11% 13.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 56 52 21 48 88 MB/s
|
35.4%
Below average
|
37% 50 MB/s
|
72% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.7%
Very poor
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q SE2 Builds (Compare 127 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples | 12x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $195 |