HP 870-219

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 870-219 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 02:26
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	65%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 200 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 447 51% 398 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 C755) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 23.7 Parallax 18.9 11% 18.7 fps	MRender 35.7 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 27.5 24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 105 108 105 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 351 Write 117 Mixed 152 SusWrite 105 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 24.9 96% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 164 143% 220 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 216GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 100 100 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 174 Write 165 Mixed 93 SusWrite 99.5 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 12GB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-219 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: HP 870-219

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	132x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	2x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	95x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	6x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	59x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x

RAM
4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 12GBMicronBench 56%, 642 samples	72x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $286

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16