Asus P5Q

Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 49%
Workstation 29%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P5Q  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 10:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$58
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 115
54% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 229
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 227
15% 227 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Asus(1043 03C0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 19.4
6% 20.2 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 13.8
4% 13.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 221 217 227 232 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.6% Above average
Read 174
Write 186
Mixed 188
SusWrite 224
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 31.7
108% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.5
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 41.5
35% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 38%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 2,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 15%
Desktop 48%
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $164
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $368Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback