| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus K52JU (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K52JU |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101028 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 28 '19 at 09:40 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
34.7%
Below average
|
34% 53.2 Pts
|
11% 90.2 Pts
|
4% 59 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Asus(1043 1C92) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
1.34%
Terrible
|
1% 1.9 fps
|
2% 1.75 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 194 194 174 173 MB/s
|
56.9%
Above average
|
42% 185 MB/s
|
96% 32.9 MB/s
|
130% 174 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
20.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
28% 140 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical K52JU Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus K52JU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 15x |
| Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples | 6x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples | 43x |
| Radeon HD 6370MAMDBench 1%, 535 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 6300M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 20 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |