AMI Intel

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 103
37% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 207
29% 209 Pts
64-Core 205
14% 205 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6
2% 5.53 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 13.7
2% 10.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 341 316 339 297 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67% Good
Read 293
Write 273
Mixed 259
SusWrite 320
65% 286 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 18.7
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 33.2
74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback