| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191107 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 27 '19 at 19:24 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.9%
Average
|
56% 105 Pts
|
50% 422 Pts
|
37% 595 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.7.3
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
10% 15.2 fps
|
13% 15.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 307 290 297 299 299 MB/s
|
123%
Outstanding
|
188% 840 MB/s
|
114% 40 MB/s
|
269% 346 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
929GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 178 179 180 179 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
98% 137 MB/s
|
149% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
31%
Below average
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
23% 175 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,984 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 436x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 322x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 300x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 220x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 199x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 164x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $298 |