Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97 3,604 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 69 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 42.2 33% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 40.9 8-Core 36.1 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 44.4 3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600-XT 296 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 30D4) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.34% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 1.16 2% 2.96 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 1 Splatting 5.3 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.34% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 192 205 206 210 210 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 231 Write 213 Mixed 209 SusWrite 190 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 28.7 96% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 116 90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 126%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 233GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 55 55 56 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 55.9 Write 56.5 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 53.3 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16