To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '19 at 07:33
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 176
57% 103 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 560
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.15003.5016
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 111
Parallax 226
78% 144 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 133
Splatting 156
112% 134 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 459 454 448 422 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 459
Mixed 372
SusWrite 447
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 44.5
149% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Nvme NE-512 512GB
134GB free
Firmware: 705A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 120 155 33 166 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 1,080
Write 790
Mixed 102
SusWrite 131
115% 526 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 14.9
88% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 49.3
DQ Mixed 19.7
97% 238 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92%
Great: 251%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
42GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.5 11 9.9 19 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 11.8
28% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
109% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.5
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback