PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140514 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 27 '19 at 01:29 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 131 145 154 174 122 MB/s
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
25.3%
Poor
|
||||
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
2TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 84 84 85 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 527x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 272x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 122x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 115x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $1,178 |