Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9300 130 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Memory 44.8 1-Core 9.7 2-Core 13.3 19% 22.6 Pts	4-Core 27.5 8-Core 30.7 4% 29.1 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0277) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.27 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Thin uSATA 128GB M 69 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: VAM05D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 36 47 49 54 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 86.6 Write 19.9 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 43.2 10% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 4.1 17% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16