Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Memory 9 1-Core 29.9 2-Core 77.9 19% 38.9 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 175 21% 164 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 3 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0327A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 281 236 288 304 319 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 365 Write 302 Mixed 313 SusWrite 286 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 13.7 64% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 37 76% 152 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 413 10% 413 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	1x

SSD
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16