Asrock N3000-NUC

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 16%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N3000-NUC  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 06:54
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Memory 20.2
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 27.4
13% 20.5 Pts
4-Core 33.3
8-Core 31.6
4% 32.5 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
ASRock(1849 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.44
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.89 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team TIM3F49128GMBA04S6 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0530A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 127 157 191 185 211 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 284
Write 225
Mixed 216
SusWrite 184
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 10.9
46% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.6
DQ Write 57.1
DQ Mixed 72.4
54% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 319
12% 319 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical N3000-NUC Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N3000-NUC

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $22Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback