Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 170 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 307 39% 297 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 75%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 128GB 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC72205 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 278 279 279 262 279 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 357 Write 270 Mixed 236 SusWrite 275 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 25.7 94% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 198 170% 250 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7EFR8A-PB 4x2GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16