Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '19 at 11:19
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 97.4 1-Core 108 2-Core 271 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 513 70% 521 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Lighting 92.8 Reflection 85.7 Parallax 80 76% 86.2 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 78.5 Splatting 75.4 73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB 12,312 User benchmarks, average bench 215% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SS0328D SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 267 268 268 268 268 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 2,701 Write 817 Mixed 123 SusWrite 288 211% 982 MB/s	4K Read 70.9 4K Write 201 4K Mixed 95.6 336% 122 MB/s	DQ Read 832 DQ Write 645 DQ Mixed 268 328% 582 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 277%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 560GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 138 138 137 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76% Very good	Read 128 Write 121 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 136 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB 2,105 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3536 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 46.1 MC Mixed 33.6 115% 40.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 43.5 SC Mixed 34.8 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 48.8 82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	477x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	78x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	90x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16