Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 170
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 486
46% 383 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.1% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 77.8
73% 68.8 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 84.4
Splatting 88.2
70% 85.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 67 50 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 410
Write 54.7
Mixed 192
SusWrite 85.9
40% 186 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 30.1
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 240
200% 287 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
363GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 132 131 133 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 161
Write 154
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 132
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
29GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 222
Write 87.5
Mixed 62.5
129% 124 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 7.4
629% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 9.8
772% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback