| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150803 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 22 '19 at 08:47 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.3%
Good
|
66% 113 Pts
|
41% 301 Pts
|
22% 352 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.15
|
56.9%
Above average
|
57% 66.5 fps
|
57% 69.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 284 284 277 274 270 MB/s
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
78% 349 MB/s
|
133% 49.1 MB/s
|
256% 346 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
423GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 113 114 116 115 MB/s
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
100% 136 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD20EZRX-00D8PB0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 152 153 155 155 MB/s
|
104% 142 MB/s
|
150% 1.07 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-675.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.4%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
52% 77.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 531 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 89x |
| Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 49x |
| Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 37x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 34x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $413 |