PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160711 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 21 '19 at 18:19 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
68.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liteon LCH-256V2S 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3C87904
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 125 130 117 119 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
471GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 133 135 137 128 MB/s
|
79.8%
Very good
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-PCTU2 500GB
422GB free, PID 01c5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 27 27 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 308x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 282x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 84x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 72x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 62x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 44x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $546 |