AZW Gemini T34

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAZW Gemini T34  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW Gemini T34
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 34
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 61.3
27% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 94.8
8-Core 130
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 131
9% 131 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2.7
1% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.2
1% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 243 78 115 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 369
Write 295
Mixed 277
SusWrite 146
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 11.7
55% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 24.7
46% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Gemini T34 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: AZW Gemini T34

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback