Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8653
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191025
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '19 at 10:32
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 119 2-Core 244 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 632 72% 561 Pts	64-Core 616 38% 616 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.42 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.3% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 47.3 47% 52.8 fps	MRender 45.2 Gravity 48.8 Splatting 49.4 39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB 3,266 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 507 565 543 235 50 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 567 Write 497 Mixed 413 SusWrite 393 105% 468 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 23.7 76% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 284 222% 308 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 135%
SSD PLUS 480GB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 305GB free Firmware: Z31000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 285 278 270 273 280 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 369 Write 332 Mixed 239 SusWrite 281 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 11.8 36% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 201 178% 268 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 777GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 168 179 180 178 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 180 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 173 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 2x8GB 5,016 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 24.7 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 25.4 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1,052x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	815x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	220x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 169%, 5,284 samples	232x
hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBSKBench 146%, 8,367 samples	219x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	187x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	218x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	166x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16