Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 172
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 356
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.72
3% 3.76 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 124 122 114 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 124
Mixed 61
SusWrite 120
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 119 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 54
Write 118
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 122
127% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 49%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
332GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 98 98 99 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 95.8
Write 40.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 97.4
82% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 48%
SD Card 1GB
1GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Read 9
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.4
7% 5.67 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback