Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 54.9 1-Core 18.3 2-Core 42 27% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 68.8 8-Core 95.4 10% 82.1 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.81 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.57 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSLAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 96 123 117 100 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 347 Write 269 Mixed 356 SusWrite 122 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 16.9 51% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 118 89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16