Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '19 at 01:00
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 272 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 959 84% 716 Pts	64-Core 1,512 94% 1,512 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.5% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 151 Parallax 136 101% 137 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 128 Splatting 102 90% 111 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 577 637 634 619 596 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,336 Write 1,200 Mixed 652 SusWrite 602 212% 947 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 38.3 127% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 1,124 DQ Write 920 DQ Mixed 927 720% 990 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 144 165 165 166 164 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 146 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 154 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 114%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$249 71 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 8.5TB free Firmware: AV01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 172 222 209 214 215 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	69.6% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 21.7 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 19.7 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	566x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,337

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16