Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '19 at 19:36
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790 1,846 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 77.2 1-Core 129 2-Core 260 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 1,004 89% 757 Pts	64-Core 2,451 152% 2,451 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 194 Parallax 174 137% 178 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 171 Splatting 125 113% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 645 641 630 631 626 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 1,719 Write 1,036 Mixed 652 SusWrite 669 226% 1,019 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 187 4K Mixed 53.6 225% 92.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,068 DQ Write 966 DQ Mixed 982 746% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 152GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 389 411 383 372 366 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 334 Write 369 Mixed 245 SusWrite 390 76% 335 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 18.4 89% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 202 168% 241 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 508GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 103 105 106 106 102 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 117 Write 99.2 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 102 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 84%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 180 177 183 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 178 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 178 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 446% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 491GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 146 146 145 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 143 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 140 141 142 141 139 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 123 Write 98.5 Mixed 71 SusWrite 139 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 127 127 126 128 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 104 Write 94.7 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 125 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 48.8 MC Mixed 29.6 104% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 9.3 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 85.9 46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16