Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 16:24
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8370-$153
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.1% Average
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 135
49% 103 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 430
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 425
28% 425 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$428
EVGA(3842 1976) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 192
Reflection 173
Parallax 191
50% 185 fps
Gravity 182
Splatting 124
62% 153 fps
Poor: 47% Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$73
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 201 185 227 236 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 463
Write 333
Mixed 301
SusWrite 212
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 41.1
133% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 9
48% 113 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$190
82GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 140 155 156 159 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 391
Write 342
Mixed 269
SusWrite 148
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 31.5
113% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 40.4
38% 57 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 119%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$141
261GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 140 155 156 158 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 346
Write 347
Mixed 304
SusWrite 148
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 34.3
112% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 47.8
39% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$146
246GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 189 271 200 225 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 464
Write 424
Mixed 407
SusWrite 208
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 42.3
139% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 47.2
56% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$141
502GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 230 206 265 214 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 460
Write 316
Mixed 153
SusWrite 227
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 39.3
86% 177 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2015)-$165
990GB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 114 116 116 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 6,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback