Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 12 '16 at 08:06
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 121
53% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 214
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 32.2
21% 28.6 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 33.3
23% 27 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 23%
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 7.06
6% 7.55 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 7.78
6% 6.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 202
Write 79
Mixed 111
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 10
72% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 11.5
17% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
122GB free
Firmware: PB3ZC61H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 51.9
Write 53.7
Mixed 52.7
40% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.34
81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback