Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1758 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 134 2-Core 209 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 760 70% 588 Pts	64-Core 982 61% 982 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.2% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 55.8 48% 58.9 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 56.7 Splatting 50.3 46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 126 60 153 18 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 481 Write 375 Mixed 364 SusWrite 118 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 40.1 156% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 195 164% 235 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 103 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 100 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 101 70% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 33.1 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 30.4 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,384x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	805x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	470x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	422x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16