| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131126 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 17 '19 at 21:33 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.5%
Above average
|
55% 90.2 Pts
|
27% 202 Pts
|
12% 202 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
81.6%
Excellent
|
71% 119 fps
|
103% 130 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
492GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 28 34 58 34 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
168% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
BUFFALO External HDD 750GB
178GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 30 29 MB/s
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
35% 26.2 MB/s
|
125% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.4%
Poor
|
20% 6.87 GB/s
|
20% 7.13 GB/s
|
47% 85.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 26x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 24x |
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples | 12x |
| Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 11x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $226 |