Intel DH55PJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemINTEL_ DH55PJ__
MotherboardIntel DH55PJ  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 97.7
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 176
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 452
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1480 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 98.6
15% 46.2 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 61
58% 71.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 139 97 3.2 116 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 213
Write 182
Mixed 155
SusWrite 106
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 18.3
61% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 22.8
DQ Mixed 20.2
15% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
436GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 122 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55PJ Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55PJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback