Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA720
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 631
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 104
Parallax 89.8
78% 96.5 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 79.3
76% 95.8 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1641 858 585 586 585 585 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 1,747
Mixed 1,237
SusWrite 807
322% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 63.8
219% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 1006
DQ Mixed 1,084
819% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 245%
Great: 296%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 960GB
456GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 373 381 375 375 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 242
Write 103
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 376
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 10.3
42% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 13.9
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback