PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20140806 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 17 '19 at 15:33 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
79.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 120 130 125 124 121 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Nvme NE-128 128GB
106GB free
Firmware: S062 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 84 83 83 84 84 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 178x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 157x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 104x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 80x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 69x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 57x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |