Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory40.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 13:02
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 788
80% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 116
Parallax 119
98% 118 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 102
Splatting 83
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1873
Write 1362
Mixed 535
276% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 56.1
186% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
276% 374 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 16TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 147
Mixed 40.5
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
321% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,153
Write 45
Mixed 87.3
1,500% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 737
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4.1
31,196% 248 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 114%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 3TB
156GB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 88.5
Mixed 60.5
104% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 76%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 02a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 34
Mixed 24.8
54% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 51%
BUFFALO Portable HDD 1TB
885GB free, PID 02c2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 19.2
108% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,113
Write 42.5
Mixed 53.3
1,392% 2,070 MB/s
4K Read 753
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
2,848% 252 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
JMicron Generic DISK01 12TB
11TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6,048
Write 37.2
Mixed 77.3
1,388% 2,054 MB/s
4K Read 749
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.8
2,922% 251 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 9905678-012.A00G 9905701-132.A00G 9905701-020.A00G 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback