Toshiba Portable PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba Portable PC  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7500
uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 43.2
28% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 44.3
8-Core 46.3
6% 45.3 Pts
64-Core 46.3
3% 46.3 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT
Toshiba(1179 0001) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.78 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 66 160 93 7.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.8% Poor
Read 91
Write 86.3
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 85
19% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 6.3
26% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 51.9
62% 108 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 99%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
421GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 111 108 107 102 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 66
SusWrite 106
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 134GB
125GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 3 3 3.2 4.3 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.4% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.1
6% 6.28 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Portable PC Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Portable PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback